> That’s why few modern fundamentalists own slaves or stone disabled people who enter church. Perhaps you can ding them for inconsistency.... I don't know of a

> That’s why few modern fundamentalists own slaves or stone disabled people who enter church. Perhaps you can ding them for inconsistency.... I don't know of any religions which require adherents to own slaves, so it is not inconsistent for a fundamentalist to not own any. (In particular, Christians are commanded to obey the laws of their country[0], in general, so owning slaves would be inconsistent). Also, I don't know why you think churchgoers would have a problem with disabled people. Jesus healed the sick, and didn't stone anyone. Perhaps you're thinking of the story of the woman caught in adultery, whom Jesus saved from being stoned.[1] [0] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+2%3A13-14&version=ESV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+2%3A13-... [1] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8%3A1-11&version=ESV https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8%3A1-11&v...