> I'm sure google had only our best interests in mind when unleashing that on us. Laughably, DoH is from the same gang of A-record squatters that refused to in

> I'm sure google had only our best interests in mind when unleashing that on us. Laughably, DoH is from the same gang of A-record squatters that refused to incorporate SRV into HTTP on the (now very evidently spurious) grounds that it could, in some scenarios, require an extra packet, and they couldn't work out how to make it backwards compatible. Having been comprehensively hijacked by the interests of advertising companies, my view of the HTTP WG has never been lower. And that's a shame because there are some smart people there, tasked with slowly eroding away the last semblance of end-to-end transparency.