4 ms·
What was communicated on social media was that the company had fired her, but it appears that the researcher tied the continuation of her work to the company ac
by Jugurtha 6y ago
What was communicated on social media was that the company had fired her, but it appears that the researcher tied the continuation of her work to the company accepting her conditions. The company did not accept.
In poker terms: one party bluffed and the other party called the bluff.
Now whether the clauses were abusive and the company was compelled to satisfy these conditions is left to lawyers, I suppose. I'm not privy to more details to have an opinion one way or the other.
- rbanffy 6y agoThis isn't poker. She made demands and stated she'd discuss it further after her PTO. Google accepted a resignation never made as a punishment (it has financial implications).
- Jugurtha 6y agoSure it's not poker. I believe the researcher was looking for an employment lawyer, and the pressure is increasing. The email was discussed in public and subsequently "published" by the company's people. Again, not privy to more details.