Which of these would result in “less money for innovation”? Carbon tax can be made revenue neutral and will net benefit innovative companies and/or customers b

Which of these would result in “less money for innovation”? Carbon tax can be made revenue neutral and will net benefit innovative companies and/or customers buying their products. LVT is literally taxing non-productive, limited, legally hereditary but actually “common heritage” capital. No damage there. I’m quite opposed to UBI myself but I think there’s plenty of other ways to improve the social safety net with less opportunity of abuse, the net benefit being that people are less concerned with staying alive (low Maslow need) and free to be creative (high Maslow need).