4 ms·

No sure about bleeding edge, because for the most part their products work but at different times they have defined: - Phones, (Original iPhone way ahead of co

No sure about bleeding edge, because for the most part their products work but at different times they have defined: - Phones, (Original iPhone way ahead of competitors) - MP3 players (Original iPods) - Tablets, (Pretty much the only serious tablet as far as I can see) - Smart Watches, (Apple Watch still defines the category) - Ultra Books, (First MacBook Air) - All in One Desktop (iMac) - Mobile CPUs (Apple silicon has been way ahead for years) - Laptop CPUs (M1) This doesn't just all happen by making existing things more "User Friendly". This takes real innovation to pull off.

CharlesW 6y ago
> No sure about bleeding edge, because for the most part their products work but at different times they have defined: I'm ex-Apple and an Apple fan as much as anyone, but I also have the benefit of being old. Not to take anything away from Apple's collective accomplishments, in many of these categories I'd say they "redefined" more than "defined". There were many smartphones before the iPhone (the Palm Treos were great), many MP3 players before the iPod, many tablets before the iPad (the Microsoft Tablet PC came out about a decade before the first iPad), all-in-one PCs go back 40 years now, etc.
- valuearb 6y ago
  There were many computers before the Xerox Alto. Xerox never made the Macintosh because they missed key innovations such as regions, the Finder, consistent UI guidelines, the ability to put a usable GUI OS in an affordable package.
  - musicale 6y ago
    PARC was also bound to Xerox which had trouble seeing beyond its photocopier business.
    - valuearb 6y ago
      Doesn't matter what PARC's limitations were, what matters was the Macintosh was a huge innovation that created what the Xerox Alto and Star were missing.
- musicale 6y ago
  > I'd say they "redefined" more than "defined" Pretty much, and they did a pretty good job too. It's kind of the difference between invention and innovation. Apple certainly does invent things, but they are a superlative innovator.

CharlesW 6y ago

> No sure about bleeding edge, because for the most part their products work but at different times they have defined: I'm ex-Apple and an Apple fan as much as anyone, but I also have the benefit of being old. Not to take anything away from Apple's collective accomplishments, in many of these categories I'd say they "redefined" more than "defined". There were many smartphones before the iPhone (the Palm Treos were great), many MP3 players before the iPod, many tablets before the iPad (the Microsoft Tablet PC came out about a decade before the first iPad), all-in-one PCs go back 40 years now, etc.

valuearb 6y ago
There were many computers before the Xerox Alto. Xerox never made the Macintosh because they missed key innovations such as regions, the Finder, consistent UI guidelines, the ability to put a usable GUI OS in an affordable package.
- musicale 6y ago
  PARC was also bound to Xerox which had trouble seeing beyond its photocopier business.
  - valuearb 6y ago
    Doesn't matter what PARC's limitations were, what matters was the Macintosh was a huge innovation that created what the Xerox Alto and Star were missing.
musicale 6y ago
> I'd say they "redefined" more than "defined" Pretty much, and they did a pretty good job too. It's kind of the difference between invention and innovation. Apple certainly does invent things, but they are a superlative innovator.