I’m interested to know the outcome of the case (if it’s not sealed, or something) next year because I think you have a good point - the NLRB seems to be making

I’m interested to know the outcome of the case (if it’s not sealed, or something) next year because I think you have a good point - the NLRB seems to be making a really broad argument. I’m assuming that their logic to support that claim is more nuanced. I don’t know, of course, but my read of the document is that it’s charging google with violations and not necessarily outlining all of the exact reasons that support it. Akin to being charged with any other crime, perhaps - all of the prosecutor’s evidence and arguments aren’t laid out from the very beginning.