3 ms·
I would not want to use your network if that was the case, and I wonder if you similarly would use someone else's network if it was configured like that. I don'
by shawnz 6y ago
I would not want to use your network if that was the case, and I wonder if you similarly would use someone else's network if it was configured like that. I don't think network operators who provide access to the Internet can realistically expect to control what their users do on the Internet, unless the network operator is also the administrator of those workstations.
- fiddlerwoaroof 6y agoMaybe, but my rule is: my home network, my rules. I can’t really do this invisibly anyways: any device I don’t control will get certificate validation errors.
- syshum 6y agoThe problem here is even the device owner is not the "administrator" of the device as we have lost ownership rights, locked behind EULA's, Patents and copyright The point of the original story is "your" meaning a device you own, is ignoring your network controls it is highly unlikely that the TV manufacturer is going to allow me to install my own custom root certs to inspect their traffic to HTTPS, so yes DoH and other things are a threat to network security, because if the TV become compromised I have limited administrative controls to prevent it other the blocking it completely which is a poor response to the problem DoH is a solution in search of a problem that can be solves in better more user friendly ways
- acdha 6y agoThey could do that any time without DoH, as has been done for years. Your true choice is allowing network access or not.