3 ms·
Seems like it starts to get weird if your forum gets millions of chess posts each day, and you pick the posts like "this global conspiracy is why the deep state
by rrss 6y ago
Seems like it starts to get weird if your forum gets millions of chess posts each day, and you pick the posts like "this global conspiracy is why the deep state is trying to ban chess," "how i saved my life by defeating a axe-murdering grandmaster (he is coming for your children too!)," "the 100 sexiest chess players," for the first page of your forum because those stories drive engagement and get you more clicks, and banish the other forum posts to page 103173.
- axython 6y agoI am curious, how would that be defined a law? Daily users? Unique visitors? Do you think in that case the government deserves to know much visitors your website has? Also wasn't the idea of Section 230 to be more for the internet companies? Would repealing mean that the internet provider can be sued for what you do? Wouldn't that be the end result? For me Section 230 is the cornerstone of the web, and I'd be very against its repeal unless you can show me that the web after that is better/safer for me and for my parents. I am all up for some clarifications as long as they do not limit my right to have a website that won't be sued out of the world for something that someone else does. And about FB, Twitter, Google, Apple deal with them with a proper tool -- antitrust. Noone will ever explain to me why FB was allowed to buy Whatsapp and Instagram.
- rrss 6y agoI don't know the answers to any of your questions.