4 ms·

Here's a vote for Hugo, the static site generator written in Go. It's blazing fast. I use it for my blog and love it.

• oknoorap 6y ago
  Have you tried NextJS or Gatsby?
  • anaganisk 6y ago
    Gatsby and its magic comes no where near Hugo, hugo is basically just select the theme and write markdown Gatsby and its quirks, are just too heavy. I would rather suggest Next.js.
    • oknoorap 6y ago
      Yep, Next.js export build to static HTML is pretty impressive.
• bogwog 6y ago
  > It's blazing fast. This seems like an odd value proposition for a static site generator. Even a really shitty, unoptimized single threaded non-incremental build system shouldn’t struggle too hard to compile a static site. And even if it does, if it has a good amount of features, it shouldn’t be a problem for most use-cases.
  • plorkyeran 6y ago
    Using jekyll I've gotten 30+ minute build times for sites. SSGs aren't only useful for sites with a single-digit number of pages.
    • JackMorgan 6y ago
      I switched from Jekyll, it's amazing to me how slow it was to build a simple hundred pages of HTML. What Hugo does in Uber a second took Jekyll several minutes.