3 ms·
> This is turning true ai research into a masquerade to push certain political agendas. Spot on. Naive scientism is used as cloak to advance political agendas,
by MrBuddyCasino 6y ago
> This is turning true ai research into a masquerade to push certain political agendas.
Spot on. Naive scientism is used as cloak to advance political agendas, instead of searching for truth:
"When a domain becomes respected source of Truth, there is incentive for hijackers. There is a huge window of opportunity (from decades to centuries) until the public opinion figures it out. Many (not all) still trust Harvard credentials, as Cardinal credentials in the past." [0]
This is the trend for "Believe in Science", a magical catchphrase evoked to put trust in frauds like Steven Pinker and Paul Krugman:
https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=believe+in+science&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cbelieve%20in%20science%3B%2Cc0#t1%3B%2Cbelieve%20in%20science%3B%2Cc0 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=believe+in+sci...
[0] https://twitter.com/_benoux_/status/1335175823620497413 https://twitter.com/_benoux_/status/1335175823620497413
- dash2 6y agoCalling Stephen Pinker a fraud is way over-the-top. He’s published a large number of extremely serious papers, including the paper introducing the ngrams dataset you just linked to.
- MrBuddyCasino 6y agoHe got challenged on his statistics [0], and didn't engage, correct or retract. This is antithetical to scholarly behaviour. Pinker is an ideologue and absolutely "the Mozart of bullshit vendors". [0] https://www.academia.edu/26772813/The_Decline_of_Violent_Conflicts_What_Do_The_Data_Really_Say https://www.academia.edu/26772813/The_Decline_of_Violent_Con...