4 ms·
Kinda the point though isn't it? We're only reading a summary of the paper because apparently the authors aren't confident enough in its quality to release it
by fastball 6y ago
Kinda the point though isn't it?
We're only reading a summary of the paper because apparently the authors aren't confident enough in its quality to release it publicly.
You can't claim that Google dismissed this paper out-of-hand while simultaneously saying "oh, but it's too much of a draft to release publicly". Uh, if it was too much of a draft for the public why shouldn't it be too drafty for Google? Are we really pretending that Google has lower standards of quality than the general public?
- viktorcode 6y agoThat, or Google is censoring the paper because of the conclusion it comes to, which doesn't align with their business interests.
- fastball 6y agoI’m taking the article at face value, which states the authors think it’s too much of a draft.
- juanbyrge 6y agoIf a company is paying a researcher a lofty salary (I am guessing ballpark mid six figures), and provides that researcher virtually unlimited tools and resources, shouldn't that company have a say in what material gets published by the researcher? Why shouldn't it have the ability to restrict research of dubious quality that makes borderline incorrect conclusions about the company?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]