9 ms·
> I was little disappointed in the quality of this research But the research is not even published yet
by hezag 6y ago
> I was little disappointed in the quality of this research
But the research is not even published yet
- fastball 6y agoKinda the point though isn't it? We're only reading a summary of the paper because apparently the authors aren't confident enough in its quality to release it publicly. You can't claim that Google dismissed this paper out-of-hand while simultaneously saying "oh, but it's too much of a draft to release publicly". Uh, if it was too much of a draft for the public why shouldn't it be too drafty for Google? Are we really pretending that Google has lower standards of quality than the general public?
- viktorcode 6y agoThat, or Google is censoring the paper because of the conclusion it comes to, which doesn't align with their business interests.
- fastball 6y agoI’m taking the article at face value, which states the authors think it’s too much of a draft.
- juanbyrge 6y agoIf a company is paying a researcher a lofty salary (I am guessing ballpark mid six figures), and provides that researcher virtually unlimited tools and resources, shouldn't that company have a say in what material gets published by the researcher? Why shouldn't it have the ability to restrict research of dubious quality that makes borderline incorrect conclusions about the company?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- rundigen12 6y agoI naively expected this article to include a link to the paper somewhere in it, so we could decide for ourselves. Oh well.