3 ms·
The paper should have been probably focused on the title only, because the CO2 usage looks like a publicity stunt. She also didn't subtract the amount of CO2 sa
by xiphias2 6y ago
The paper should have been probably focused on the title only, because the CO2 usage looks like a publicity stunt. She also didn't subtract the amount of CO2 saved by improved productivity by getting better search results.
- ardit33 6y agoYep, it feels very disingenuous.... It is like someone complaining that google map uses x, amount of energy, yet the old alternative (printing maps, and getting lost) was much worse CO2 wise.