Why should they? It's my music that I'm simply storing in another location. Do the music execs actually think that they have a right to be upset about this? (I

Why should they? It's my music that I'm simply storing in another location. Do the music execs actually think that they have a right to be upset about this? (I ask this seemingly rhetoric question because after Amazon launched their service apparently there were threats and rumblings from some of them) Sure, they have a right to not license their music for sale on the service, and that's their own ignorance. Someone needs to slap them across the face with Steam. I've spent hundreds of times more dollars on games than I have music, and I exclusively buy games on Steam because of the convenience and because of the "cloud" aspect. My games themselves, saves, etc, synced and available anywhere? My usic synced and available everywhere? And free storage if I buy it? I can click a button and have the latest Lupe Fiasco album on ALL of my devices instantly? I would happily, HAPPILY hand over $10/album for that convenience. They just don't get it, and pirating and free/cheap private storage will benefit from their loss.