10 ms·
Well, the former lets someone have a job, however underpaid.
by ummonk 6y ago
Well, the former lets someone have a job, however underpaid.
- albatruss 6y agoThis is a reason to challenge the value of jobs, not a reason to materially damage our irreplaceable environment. Social constructions must yield to material reality.
- dsohn0 6y agoYeah, like the material reality where people need to work. Talk about ironic.
- ClumsyPilot 6y agoIf you ate gonna waste money to create jobs you could habe a public works programm for planting trees, or have mandatory conscription and bigger military, or have government paid for education, or infrastructure, or any number of other things
- triceratops 6y agoWhat's so great about a shitty job that destroys the world?
- ummonk 6y agoIt puts food in your belly and lets you buy medicine.
- CameronNemo 6y agoReminds of brave new world. The world government has to encourage consumption so that everyone has a job. People without jobs get restless, even if their needs are met.
- LockAndLol 6y agoAre you really thinking this through? You are justifying child and slave labor and exploiting other countries right now because of "Arbeit macht frei".