> [...] defend their last-minute issues [...] Jeff Dean's response claims that the paper was "only shared with a day’s notice before its deadline", when Google

> [...] defend their last-minute issues [...] Jeff Dean's response claims that the paper was "only shared with a day’s notice before its deadline", when Google "require two weeks" for their internal review process. So the issues were last-minute, but only because the paper was. > Why should they need to shroud themselves in secrecy? Anonymity is common in paper reviews, to prevent retribution and help keep it objective.