4 ms·
That's no justification for the rationale that critique or negative results in general are not paper worth or do not advance science in less short-sighted ways.
by calf 6y ago
That's no justification for the rationale that critique or negative results in general are not paper worth or do not advance science in less short-sighted ways.
- BeetleB 6y agoI wasn't discussing the appropriateness - I was pointing out that this behavior is normal in science. Your original comment was: > Since when is a scientific paper required to do that. Unfortunately, for a long time (since well before my time, at least).