>Dean says the paper was reviewed by a "cross-functional team". Gebru says she received the feedback through a "privileged and confidential document to HR" I d

>Dean says the paper was reviewed by a "cross-functional team". Gebru says she received the feedback through a "privileged and confidential document to HR" I don't think these two takes are at odds with each other at all. It sounds like a cross-functional team reviewed the paper and produced that "privileged and confidential document" but Gebru didn't find that document sufficiently detailed.