2 ms·
> But this review process had never been used for introducing comments of this sort to a paper ever before How do you know that?
by lokar 6y ago
> But this review process had never been used for introducing comments of this sort to a paper ever before
How do you know that?
- pseudalopex 6y ago"My submissions were always checked for disclosure of sensitive material, never for the quality of the literature review."[1] "In all of my time at Google AI, I never heard of pubapproval being used for peer review or to critique the scientific rigor of the work. It was never used as a journal, it was an afterthought that folks on my team would usually clear only hours before important deadlines. We like to leave peer review to the conferences/journals' existing process to weed out bad papers; why duplicate that work internally?"[2] [1] https://twitter.com/le_roux_nicolas/status/1334601960972906496 https://twitter.com/le_roux_nicolas/status/13346019609729064... [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25307456 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25307456
- lokar 6y agoHuh. When I was there I certainly saw review for quality / novel ideas.