3 ms·
In many ways Reason's design limits the efficiency of its use, and it's hardware modelled approach is of no use (and in fact a hindrance) to the majority of use
by mambodog 15y ago
In many ways Reason's design limits the efficiency of its use, and it's hardware modelled approach is of no use (and in fact a hindrance) to the majority of users whom have never touched outboard audio gear.
I'm glad that companies like Native Instruments are building interfaces that are driven by usability[1], not analog fetishism, and I have high hopes that Apple will do the same with the next version of Logic Pro, if their approach to Final Cut Pro X[2] is anything to go by.
[1] http://www.creativeobserver.com/img/5238_native_instruments_razor_synhesizer_reaktor_plug-in_screenshot_lg.jpg http://www.creativeobserver.com/img/5238_native_instruments_...
[2] http://vicenteborrell.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/final-cut-pro-x-b.jpg http://vicenteborrell.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/final-cut-...
- hammock 15y agoWell yeah most of the time I am in Logic or ProTools. Clearly it's less efficient to work in Reason. But it's way more fun :)