2 ms·

This is a common hard-libertarian talking point. Consider point 13.6 of Scott Alexander's (Slate Star Codex) Non-Libertarian FAQ: https://slatestarcodex.com/2

This is a common hard-libertarian talking point. Consider point 13.6 of Scott Alexander's (Slate Star Codex) Non-Libertarian FAQ: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/22/repost-the-non-libertarian-faq/#rights_and_heuristics https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/02/22/repost-the-non-liberta... If you assume that "individual property earned through voluntary exchange" is the ultimate value to be upheld, you may end up having to defend a hellscape world. You need at least to temper it with something along the lines of the Lockean proviso.

hnracer 6y ago
I fully agree with this, I see it as one value to be upheld among many others in a Pareto-like trade-off. Optimizing for only a single value is going to lead to pathological outcomes as you rightly point out. But I do consider it an important value since a lot of the motivation behind redistribution is self interest and jealousy (this is a finding in social science research), benelovant compassion only explains a small proportion of the variation.