4 ms·
For as long as they are willing to stay slaves, I see nothing wrong with trading them. Outside of that situation, though, the right to body is unalienable (acco
by jsn 15y ago
For as long as they are willing to stay slaves, I see nothing wrong with trading them. Outside of that situation, though, the right to body is unalienable (according to many rights theories).
The money came from British (banks, sponsored by artificially expanded money supply of BoE), German, French banks (sponsored by artificially expanded money supply of ECB), etc. I've got my order exactly correct. Then, when the crisis hit, more money come from ECB. It's a little surprise that the problem caused by excess money is not exactly fixed (in PIIGS) by more excess money.
Seriously, it's ABCT 101.
- barrkel 15y agoSee, I do see something wrong with trading in slaves; but not because it's contrary to free markets. Re your selective fitting of crisis to monetary theory, I'm not going to comment; there are too many factors at work to be reductive about it.