3 ms·
Until now, nobody on my previous team at Google had to have their papers reviewed internally for scientific rigour either. (We have a publication approval proc
by gcr 6y ago
Until now, nobody on my previous team at Google had to have their papers reviewed internally for scientific rigour either.
(We have a publication approval process, but its purpose is to prevent IP leaks and maybe shield liability, not uphold scientific rigour standards)
- lokar 6y agoI've seen Urs reject papers out of Tech Infra that he thought were not interesting enough
- lallysingh 6y agoThis is the AI Ethics team in a company betting their future on AI. They know they have a bubbling ethics problem and they've screwed over their best chance to do anything other than completely fuck it up. In history, this will be a wtf double facepalm moment.
- kazamaloo 6y agoTechnically you can submit it without pubapprove unless somebody rats you out and you might face some repercussions. Otherwise every paper is supposed to go through AI Ethics committee review along with other types of reviews.