Child porn falls into 'reasonable limit on free speech' category because kids are harmed in the making of it. Has nothing to do with IP. I think non-digital IP

Child porn falls into 'reasonable limit on free speech' category because kids are harmed in the making of it. Has nothing to do with IP. I think non-digital IP is a bad idea as well and serves established publishers, not content producers. Trying to pass off someone's work as your own is already frowned upon socially. There's no need to make it a legal issue. It's sad that we as a society feel that we need the state to referee every single transaction. If you are able to produce something of value, you can find a way to profit from it whether others can copy it or not. If a lot of people want to copy your work, that is actually a good sign and gives you more opportunity for profit. You just have to be a bit more creative than the RIAA.