4 ms·
This is utterly thinking out my ass, but here is a question I had about IPv6 that I thought I would ask: Could it make sense to use a network wrapper around so
by phlux 15y ago
This is utterly thinking out my ass, but here is a question I had about IPv6 that I thought I would ask:
Could it make sense to use a network wrapper around some types of objects, such that each object has an IPv6 address - and all communications between then occur over IP?
Say you build a distributed app where each component of the app has an IP wrapper - you can deploy the various components in such a way where the calls between them occur on IP - this may allow you to deploy an app across multiple cloud vendors that would otherwise not have the ability to mix and match services.
Say, you have one vendor that has super cheap storage, and another has a particular hardware-based feature you want to tak advantage of. Deploy part of your application across both - linking the components through IPv6 tunnels...
Obviously there are performance issues with this - but it may make it more secure/resilient if those factors are more important.
E.g. you could have duplicate service components spread across multiple vendors which would make the overall app much harder to take down in an outage....
so aside from performance.... what other thoughts would there be against making core components wrapped which are globally addressable?