Absolutely. The supposedly objectionable tone in the EMails she posted was after leadership censored her paper in an apparently unprecedented and intransparent

Absolutely. The supposedly objectionable tone in the EMails she posted was after leadership censored her paper in an apparently unprecedented and intransparent internal review. She has a track record of publishing peer reviewed and well received papers, and the paper in question was going through a normal peer review process when it was halted internally. To any academic the explanations of leadership are transparently absurd. No academic of integrity could accept that as a work environment, doubly so if you were hired as Ethical AI Lead. It simply indicates to me that Google as an organisation is no longer capable of having a serious Ethical AI Lab.