Exactly, most new stories bringing up the July Twitter dispute as context for her current firing is extremely polarizing. The story could just be "well known G

Exactly, most new stories bringing up the July Twitter dispute as context for her current firing is extremely polarizing. The story could just be "well known Google ethics research quickly let go over paper dispute" but instead the "also she had an altercation in July which really riled people up." Does the twitter dispute context help as much as her contributions to her field and whatever the specific paper and terms of its publication? No clue personally, but now I know it's a "bad thing" and she's a "rabble-rouser that likely had it coming".