4 ms·
Most of those are not CPU tests. But even in the link you provided 865+ has best performance/watt in every test in GPU Performance & Power. Here is Nanoreview'
by Nokinside 6y ago
Most of those are not CPU tests. But even in the link you provided 865+ has best performance/watt in every test in GPU Performance & Power.
Here is Nanoreview's Snapdragon 865 Plus vs A13 Bionic CPU performance tests:
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-865-plus-vs-apple-a13-bionic https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/qualcomm-snapdragon-86...
(btw. My argument is not that Apple is worse)
- whynotminot 6y agoJavaScript perf is a GPU test? I guess I'm learning new things every day. (The link I shared is all CPU leaning performance tests.) Nanoreview? Really dude? In the "Pro" section for the 865+ it lists two more cores (factual but largely irrelevant) and in the "Pro" section of the A13 it lists "Compatible with the latest DirectX 12.1" (laughably hilariously untrue). I love how nano review has become the Android fan bible, despite its very obvious flaws.
- attractivechaos 6y agoAlso, the Antutu developers said scores between different OSes are not comparable: https://www.antutu.com/en/doc/119646.htm https://www.antutu.com/en/doc/119646.htm but some people just love to boast how Android is better based on Antutu...