> I, on equal grounding, assert that the author is wrong. The burden of proof remains with the author. The author, at least, gave relevant analogies from his a

> I, on equal grounding, assert that the author is wrong. The burden of proof remains with the author. The author, at least, gave relevant analogies from his area of expertise. I don't see any evidence to back up your assertion, or even what you think he's wrong about. > ...resume the conversations others began long ago. That's what the author is doing. > There is nothing new under the sun. Strange comment to make on HN. The author's exhortation to "to change the world and make it a better place" seems like it should fit right in to the mindset of those who frequent this site.