24 ms·

I generally agree with you but I don‘t like the > I would also reduce worker-protections for the highest earners, especially freelancers. It should be for all

I generally agree with you but I don‘t like the > I would also reduce worker-protections for the highest earners, especially freelancers. It should be for all freelancers or for none. Otherwise a situation like with the „accredited investor“ is created which is harming poorer but responsible people from taking opportunities.

allendoerfer 6y ago
What I am proposing is: Keep everything for employees/freelancers < top 5%. If you earn more, you are obviously not being exploited, so there is no danger of false self-employment you have to be protected from.