It's a pretty poor argument when your own summary of the opposing side > the only way to become a billionaire is by exploiting people needs to be revised to a

It's a pretty poor argument when your own summary of the opposing side > the only way to become a billionaire is by exploiting people needs to be revised to a keener straw-man in your very next paragraph: > the key to becoming a billionaire — the defining feature of billionaires — was to exploit people Here he's swapping necessary-but-not-sufficient for definitionally-equal-to.