3 ms·
I think you'd be biting off the hand that feeds you. If you eliminate what is arguably a distasteful arrangement here, you also eliminate the incentive to conti
by orblivion 16y ago
I think you'd be biting off the hand that feeds you. If you eliminate what is arguably a distasteful arrangement here, you also eliminate the incentive to continue doing it. You might get this bug for free, but you get a hidden loss, a bunch of future bugs that you'll never hear about.
Think about the audacity of farmers, who make a profit for food, which you need to live. But nobody thinks like that for some reason.
Earning profit just means you've done something for someone who really wanted it done. It's a necessary signal.
- syllogism 16y agoI felt the same way until this comment below: > http://www.vupen.com/english/services/ http://www.vupen.com/english/services/ > As the world leader in vulnerability research, VUPEN Security provides weaponized and highly sophisticated exploits specifically designed for Law Enforcement and Intelligence Agencies to help them achieve their offensive missions using tailored and unique codes created in-house by VUPEN for vulnerabilities discovered by our researchers. Note also the "under contract with VUPEN" part of the disclosure bit.