3 ms·
It doesn't have to be this way. Hopefully Brython[0] which lets you do client-side Python scripting takes off. Imagine doing full stack web dev without seeing
by optimalsolver 6y ago
It doesn't have to be this way.
Hopefully Brython[0] which lets you do client-side Python scripting takes off.
Imagine doing full stack web dev without seeing a single line of JS.
[0] https://brython.info/ https://brython.info/
- jfoster 6y agoI love the idea. From experience, though, this type of thing becomes a bit painful when you realise that you actually want to use some of the tools & code from the javascript world.
- The_Colonel 6y agoThat's just replacing one passable scripting language with another passable scripting language, just with worse performance. I don't see the point.
- niek_pas 6y agoBrython has been around for _years_ now and AFAIK has not shown any signs of taking off. I think you're better off placing your bets on newer ECMAscript features and full-conversion libraries like React.
- bdcravens 6y agoI think building apps in Rails/Opal is just as likely. Seriously though, I'm putting a lot of hope in the LiveView/Stimulus Reflex/etc approach.
- speedgoose 6y agoI very much prefer modern JavaScript compared to Python. It's faster, has a better async support, as powerful, and I don't have to care about white space.