> Plus given that it is a tourist atttraction now, the fine would likely not be that high. It _was_ a tourist attraction, as it has already been removed by now

> Plus given that it is a tourist atttraction now, the fine would likely not be that high. It _was_ a tourist attraction, as it has already been removed by now. Given that it was an unwanted tourist attraction, causing people to litter there and disturb the local wildlife, I think the responsible agency would want to enforce a fine as much as they can.