It's more interesting that this is appearing on something as mainstream/everyday as Reuters. And honestly they're not wrong about there needing to be fundament

It's more interesting that this is appearing on something as mainstream/everyday as Reuters. And honestly they're not wrong about there needing to be fundamental rights against neural editing, free will suppression, and similar in regards to neural implants. Essentially public opinion puts tech down as being far outside of socially acceptable norms when it comes to surveillance and manipulation (and they'll end up in hot water as it becomes more public what's being recorded and how it's used).