2 ms·
First of all, thank you for taking the time for a rebuttal. >There is no information about what proportion of the populations actually wore masks If you had s
by thepangolino 6y ago
First of all, thank you for taking the time for a rebuttal.
>There is no information about what proportion of the populations actually wore masks
If you had scrolled a bit, you'd have seen the chart linked highlighting compliance rates: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/international/articles-reports/2020/03/17/personal-measures-taken-avoid-covid-19 https://yougov.co.uk/topics/international/articles-reports/2...
- kwhitefoot 6y agoSorry, missed that. I looked at the chart titled 'Avoiding going to work' and was bemused because I couldn't see the line for Norway, where I live. When I turned of the Asia, and US I was able to see it. It would be interesting to know the expected error of the surveys that were used to generate that because the impression I have is that vastly more than 18% of the Norwegian working population is working from home. In fact even in normal times a lot of people work from home a significant fraction of the time. So I am still of the opinion that such charts don't tell us very much and in particular they do not tell us how much we can rely on them. And one last point: there is a chart showing that 40% of Norwegians say that they are 'Avoiding physical contact with tourists'. What tourists? There have been essentially zero foreign tourists in Norway since March and internal tourism has practically disappeared a well so what meaning, if any, can be associated with such a statistic.