3 ms·
I've been running git lfs without a webserver on my local NAS with lfs-folderstore[0] without a problem, and it doesn't require a webserver (and can also be use
by hobofan 6y ago
I've been running git lfs without a webserver on my local NAS with lfs-folderstore[0] without a problem, and it doesn't require a webserver (and can also be used over SSH via sshfs). I can understand wanting such functionality bundled with git lfs, but all the different options seem very opinionated to me in ways that there isn't a clear "default" choice. To me custom transfer agents and transports never felt like an afterthought, and fit quite nicely into there.
My main problems with git lfs were more UX problems where certain workloads are not as well supported (e.g. keeping only a portion of the LFS files local).
[0]: https://github.com/sinbad/lfs-folderstore https://github.com/sinbad/lfs-folderstore