2 ms·
As dynamic as the development is, I think including the month of publication in Corona-related submissions might not be the worst idea. The paper is open acces
by _Microft 6y ago
As dynamic as the development is, I think including the month of publication in Corona-related submissions might not be the worst idea.
The paper is open access by the way.
- prof-dr-ir 6y agoI actually think that you highlighted the wrong date: this paper was put online in June, received for review in July, approved in November, and published in December. June version: http://ftp.iza.org/dp13319.pdf http://ftp.iza.org/dp13319.pdf