3 ms·
Override the caselaw to take "consumer welfare" off its special pedestal. The higher order effects are much more important, I would also allow sufficiently-emp
by Ericson2314 6y ago
Override the caselaw to take "consumer welfare" off its special pedestal. The higher order effects are much more important,
I would also allow sufficiently-employee-owned companies to be exempt in certain respects, to keep the co-op path to socialism open :).
- nobody9999 6y ago>Override the caselaw to take "consumer welfare" off its special pedestal. The higher order effects are much more important, What might those "higher order effects" be? I'm not being snarky here, I'm just not clear what it is that you're arguing for that makes "consumer welfare" unimportant. It's a provocative position, but you haven't given enough information to evaluate it. Any help you could provide would be greatly appreciated!
- Ericson2314 6y agoThe first part of what I said is actually an oft-repeated opinion you are giving me way to much credit for. A quick google gave me https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2987&context=faculty_scholarship https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?articl..., which from the little I read does a great job of explaining what's going on.