3 ms·
From Dean's email: "A cross functional team then reviewed the paper as part of our regular process and the authors were informed that it didn’t meet our bar fo
by fantod 6y ago
From Dean's email:
"A cross functional team then reviewed the paper as part of our regular process and the authors were informed that it didn’t meet our bar for publication and were given feedback about why. It ignored too much relevant research — for example, it talked about the environmental impact of large models, but disregarded subsequent research showing much greater efficiencies. Similarly, it raised concerns about bias in language models, but didn’t take into account recent research to mitigate these issues."
Is it true that this information was not shared with her?
- 1024core 6y agoWould you share the identities of the reviewers, if the author has a history of attacking anyone who disagrees with them??
- fantod 6y agoSorry, I was referring to the assertion that "they wouldn't share the feedback on her paper".
- room500 6y agoAccording to her, she was allowed to see the feedback confidentially, but was not given the names of the authors of the feedback.
- 1024core 6y agoBecause she wanted to attack them! That's how she has reached where she is: by attacking and silencing anyone who disagrees with her, and then turning around and classifying their opposition as "sexism/racism"; and who wants to be labeled as a sexist/racist these days? People would much rather just keep quiet.