Regarding Dominion, are you referring to this? https://www.infowars.com/posts/firm-that-owns-dominion-voting-systems-received-400-million-from-swiss-bank-with-

Regarding Dominion, are you referring to this? https://www.infowars.com/posts/firm-that-owns-dominion-voting-systems-received-400-million-from-swiss-bank-with-connection-to-chinese-government-before-election/ https://www.infowars.com/posts/firm-that-owns-dominion-votin... Even according to that (notorious) site, what actually happened was that "its parent company, Staple Street Capital, received hundreds of millions from UBS Securities - which is a Swiss bank that co-owns UBS Securities Co. Ltd. with the Chinese government". So the money came from a Swiss bank, not a Chinese one. UBS Securities Co LTD, the Chinese entity mentioned in the article, is a joint venture of the same kind which plenty of other big Western banks (including US ones) have in China. Until recently, such minority-owned joint ventures were the only way for them to operate there. See e.g. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-morgan-stanley-china-idUSKBN21E1AO https://www.reuters.com/article/us-morgan-stanley-china-idUS... As far as I can tell, the "story" is an attempt to exploit confusion between a Swiss bank and the Chinese joint venture, which wasn't actually involved at all.