> I just don't like the almost-religious overhyping of everything Apple. They're doing a great job. They're not perfect. That may be so, but again that doesn't

> I just don't like the almost-religious overhyping of everything Apple. They're doing a great job. They're not perfect. That may be so, but again that doesn't really apply to the M1's performance as hardware. If the article was about Apple as an investment, or Apple as the designer of the next computer for me, I'd agree that taking into account their software would make sense. But the whole point of the article is that equating Apple's being Apple with the M1 being a badly designed chip is wrong.