41 ms·
That's not good. The courts should only have to get involved in exceptional scenarios. The law itself should be more clear.
by TulliusCicero 6y ago
That's not good. The courts should only have to get involved in exceptional scenarios. The law itself should be more clear.
- llbeansandrice 6y agoI suppose that's your opinion but that's just not how the law works and in many cases the subjectivity is a feature not a bug. It might be a common sense thing to say that no one would ever want or have need to use a horse as a service animal, but there are miniature horses that are service animals.
- TulliusCicero 6y agoIt's not uncommon for judges to complain about laws being excessively vague, so no, it's not just my opinion. Also IIRC miniature horses being service animals is explicitly part of the law, so I'm not sure why you're using that as an example.