> is that a problem that Urbit has Yarvin's goal was to preempt this issue before it might become a problem. Don't get mad at me for explaining this - I'm not

> is that a problem that Urbit has Yarvin's goal was to preempt this issue before it might become a problem. Don't get mad at me for explaining this - I'm not even convinced any of this makes sense. I'm just articulating Yarvin's arguments. I'm not "selling" anything. I don't have any stake in Urbit.