3 ms·
it's apples to oranges. you are talking about doctors endorsing certain drugs and writing prescriptions based on fraudulent claims by the manufacturer. how can
by leetcrew 6y ago
it's apples to oranges. you are talking about doctors endorsing certain drugs and writing prescriptions based on fraudulent claims by the manufacturer. how can this possibly inform a reasonable discussion on legalization?
- Geminidog 6y agoNo it's apples to apples. I'm not talking about doctors endorsing drugs... that's what you added. I'm talking about easier access. If I wanted an opioid fix one avenue is pain medication, yes it's through a doctor but this is not starting usage through endorsement it's using a doctor as a new doorway for access. The epidemic in the US is caused by endorsement AND easier access, but I'm not comparing the endorsement part, just the easier access. The endorsement is indeed a separate phenomenon.