Adam Curtis may be right. Note the "tl;dr" by evangineer which suggests that at least one reader did not have the attention span to read the short article. Of

Adam Curtis may be right. Note the "tl;dr" by evangineer which suggests that at least one reader did not have the attention span to read the short article. Of course, it is not a given that comment is due to a computer reshaped view of reality, but that's my working null-hypothesis. (cf. recent xkcd panel (#892) and the TX BOE statements on evolution)