4 ms·
> Including a package size comparison That's a great idea. A developer recently tweeted[1]: 3.gkB gziped vs firebase which is 218.2kB > Waiting for the r
by kiwicopple 6y ago
> Including a package size comparison
That's a great idea. A developer recently tweeted[1]:
3.gkB gziped vs firebase which is 218.2kB
> Waiting for the realtime API to be capable of filtering based on row level security and I'll definitely try it on some "serious"
We have a solution for this underway, and it's great to get this feedback because it helps us prioritise.
[1] https://twitter.com/chiubaca/status/1328654022832758786 https://twitter.com/chiubaca/status/1328654022832758786
- ngyekta 6y agoI have looked at Firebase core + realtime + auth vs Supabase.js and results were very much in Supabase's favor :) Understandable though since Firebase is doing a bunch of other things under the hood. I would still call it a relatively fair comparison. Also, I think the primary buttons on the website has an easily fixable contrast problem. I just created an issue for it.
- kiwicopple 6y agoTo be fair to Firebase, they have a lot more functionality in their client libraries than ours. But they are definitely bloated, and I think they are working on reducing their bundle sizes. This is something we are very cognisant of - we will keep our bundles modular and easy to tree-shake (keeping admin functions separate). > the primary buttons on the website has an easily fixable contrast problem Thanks for the fix! We'll merge tomorrow, because the whole team is asleep..