3 ms·
Congrats on the launch. Waiting for the realtime API to be capable of filtering based on row level security and I'll definitely try it on some "serious" side pr
by yekta 6y ago
Congrats on the launch. Waiting for the realtime API to be capable of filtering based on row level security and I'll definitely try it on some "serious" side projects afterwards. Small suggestion regarding the Firebase comparison: Including a package size comparison for various Firebase packages (realtime, auth etc.) vs Supabase.js might be useful.
- kiwicopple 6y ago> Including a package size comparison That's a great idea. A developer recently tweeted[1]: 3.gkB gziped vs firebase which is 218.2kB > Waiting for the realtime API to be capable of filtering based on row level security and I'll definitely try it on some "serious" We have a solution for this underway, and it's great to get this feedback because it helps us prioritise. [1] https://twitter.com/chiubaca/status/1328654022832758786 https://twitter.com/chiubaca/status/1328654022832758786
- ngyekta 6y agoI have looked at Firebase core + realtime + auth vs Supabase.js and results were very much in Supabase's favor :) Understandable though since Firebase is doing a bunch of other things under the hood. I would still call it a relatively fair comparison. Also, I think the primary buttons on the website has an easily fixable contrast problem. I just created an issue for it.
- kiwicopple 6y agoTo be fair to Firebase, they have a lot more functionality in their client libraries than ours. But they are definitely bloated, and I think they are working on reducing their bundle sizes. This is something we are very cognisant of - we will keep our bundles modular and easy to tree-shake (keeping admin functions separate). > the primary buttons on the website has an easily fixable contrast problem Thanks for the fix! We'll merge tomorrow, because the whole team is asleep..