From what I understand, her access to said information (I assume you mean the content of the email she sent to the group) was cut off, so she wasn't actually in

From what I understand, her access to said information (I assume you mean the content of the email she sent to the group) was cut off, so she wasn't actually in a position to (legally) share it any longer. This seems to be it though, and I quoted some (I think) relevant parts of what she's criticizing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25292266 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25292266