3 ms·
It was not a value judgement, just a prediction. Some judges do look at the impact of a ruling. I personally don't think they should be legally binding (as I su
by mgamache 6y ago
It was not a value judgement, just a prediction. Some judges do look at the impact of a ruling. I personally don't think they should be legally binding (as I suspect most HN readers do).
"doesn't matter how much money they lose" -- of course it does, these companies employ people and generate lots of government revenue (even if they skirt corporate taxes).
- wizzwizz4 6y agoAnd if they fold due to privacy violations, another company will usually take their place.
- matheusmoreira 6y ago> these companies employ people and generate lots of government revenue (even if they skirt corporate taxes). There are political and economic concerns, not judicial. The fact the company is important does nothing to remedy the fact that it exfiltrated private information to foreign intelligence agencies.